Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 5 de 5
1.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 166(1): 115, 2024 Feb 28.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38416251

PURPOSE: The purpose of our study was to examine the long-term outcomes of operated Chiari malformation type 1 (CM1) patients and evaluate whether different duraplasty techniques affected outcome after surgery in Kuopio University Hospital catchment area. METHODS: In this retrospective study, a total of 93 patients were diagnosed with CM1 and underwent posterior fossa decompression surgery with or without duraplasty between 2005 and 2020. All patients' medical records were examined for baseline characteristics, surgical details, and long-term follow-up data after operation. RESULTS: The mean age of CM1 patients was 25.9 years (SD 19.2 years), with female preponderance 69/93 (73.4%). The mean clinical follow-up time was 26.5 months (SD 33.5 months). The most common presenting symptoms were headache, symptoms of extremities, and paresthesia. Posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty was performed in 87 (93.5%) patients and bony decompression in 6 (6.5%) patients. After surgery, preoperative symptoms alleviated in 84.9% (79/93) and the postoperative syringomyelia regression rate was 89.2% (33/37) of all patients. The postoperative complication rate was 34.4% (32/93), with aseptic meningitis being the most common, 25.8% (24/93). Revision surgery was required in 14% (13/93) of patients. No significant correlation between postoperative outcome and extent of dural decompression, or type of duraplasty performed was found. CONCLUSION: This is the largest reported series of surgically treated CM1 patients in Finland. Posterior fossa decompression is an effective procedure for CM1 symptomology. Duraplasty technique had no significant difference in complication rate or long-term outcomes.


Arnold-Chiari Malformation , Humans , Female , Adult , Finland/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Arnold-Chiari Malformation/epidemiology , Arnold-Chiari Malformation/surgery , Headache , Hospitals, University
2.
J Surg Res ; 282: 101-108, 2023 02.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36265429

INTRODUCTION: Most microsurgical procedures require the surgeon to use tools to grasp and hold fragile objects in the surgical site. Prior research on grasping in surgery has mostly either been in other surgical techniques or used grasping as an auxiliary metric. We focus on microsurgery and investigate what grasping can tell about microsurgical skill and suturing performance. This study lays groundwork for using automatic detection of grasps to evaluate surgical skill. METHODS: Five expert surgeons and six novices completed sutures on a microsurgical training board. Video recordings of the performance were annotated for the number of grasps, while an eye tracker recorded the participants' pupil dilations for cognitive workload assessment. Performance was measured with suturing duration and the University of Western Ontario Microsurgical Skills Assessment instrument (UWOMSA). Differences in skill, suturing performance and cognitive workload were compared with grasping behavior. RESULTS: Novices needed significantly more grasps to complete sutures and failed to grasp more often than the experts. The number of grasps affected the suturing duration more in novices. Decreasing suturing efficiency as measured by UWOMSA instrument was associated with increase in grasps, even when we controlled for overall skill differences. Novices displayed larger pupil dilations when averaged over a sufficiently large sample, and the difference increased after the grasp. CONCLUSIONS: Grasping action during microsurgical procedures can be used as a conceptually simple yet objective proxy in microsurgical performance assessment. If the grasps could be detected automatically, they could be used to aid in computational evaluation of surgical trainees' performance.


Clinical Competence , Surgeons , Humans , Sutures , Microsurgery , Hand Strength
3.
Neuroradiology ; 63(12): 2035-2046, 2021 Dec.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34389887

PURPOSE: Automated analysis of neuroimaging data is commonly based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but sometimes the availability is limited or a patient might have contradictions to MRI. Therefore, automated analyses of computed tomography (CT) images would be beneficial. METHODS: We developed an automated method to evaluate medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA), global cortical atrophy (GCA), and the severity of white matter lesions (WMLs) from a CT scan and compared the results to those obtained from MRI in a cohort of 214 subjects gathered from Kuopio and Helsinki University Hospital registers from 2005 - 2016. RESULTS: The correlation coefficients of computational measures between CT and MRI were 0.9 (MTA), 0.82 (GCA), and 0.86 (Fazekas). CT-based measures were identical to MRI-based measures in 60% (MTA), 62% (GCA) and 60% (Fazekas) of cases when the measures were rounded to the nearest full grade variable. However, the difference in measures was 1 or less in 97-98% of cases. Similar results were obtained for cortical atrophy ratings, especially in the frontal and temporal lobes, when assessing the brain lobes separately. Bland-Altman plots and weighted kappa values demonstrated high agreement regarding measures based on CT and MRI. CONCLUSIONS: MTA, GCA, and Fazekas grades can also be assessed reliably from a CT scan with our method. Even though the measures obtained with the different imaging modalities were not identical in a relatively extensive cohort, the differences were minor. This expands the possibility of using this automated analysis method when MRI is inaccessible or contraindicated.


Alzheimer Disease , White Matter , Alzheimer Disease/pathology , Atrophy/diagnostic imaging , Atrophy/pathology , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Brain/pathology , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , White Matter/diagnostic imaging , White Matter/pathology
4.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 163(12): 3353-3368, 2021 12.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34453214

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a rare disease of unknown aetiology related possibly to disturbed cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics and characterised by elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) causing optic nerve atrophy if not timely treated. We studied CSF dynamics of the IIH patients based on the available literature and our well-defined cohort. METHOD: A literature review was performed from PubMed between 1980 and 2020 in compliance with the PRISMA guideline. Our study includes 59 patients with clinical, demographical, neuro-ophthalmological, radiological, outcome data, and lumbar CSF pressure measurements for suspicion of IIH; 39 patients had verified IIH while 20 patients did not according to Friedman's criteria, hence referred to as symptomatic controls. RESULTS: The literature review yielded 19 suitable studies; 452 IIH patients and 264 controls had undergone intraventricular or lumbar CSF pressure measurements. In our study, the mean CSF pressure, pulse amplitudes, power of respiratory waves (RESP), and the pressure constant (P0) were higher in IIH than symptomatic controls (p < 0.01). The mean CSF pressure was higher in IIH patients with psychiatric comorbidity than without (p < 0.05). In IIH patients without acetazolamide treatment, the RAP index and power of slow waves were also higher (p < 0.05). IIH patients with excess CSF around the optic nerves had lower relative pulse pressure coefficient (RPPC) and RESP than those without (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our literature review revealed increased CSF pressure, resistance to CSF outflow and sagittal sinus pressure (SSP) as key findings in IIH. Our study confirmed significantly higher lumbar CSF pressure and increased CSF pressure waves and RAP index in IIH when excluding patients with acetazolamide treatment. In overall, the findings reflect decreased craniospinal compliance and potentially depleted cerebral autoregulation resulting from the increased CSF pressure in IIH. The increased slow waves in patients without acetazolamide may indicate issues in autoregulation, while increased P0 could reflect the increased SSP.


Intracranial Hypertension , Pseudotumor Cerebri , Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure , Comorbidity , Cranial Sinuses , Humans , Intracranial Hypertension/epidemiology
5.
J Alzheimers Dis ; 75(3): 751-765, 2020.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32310181

BACKGROUND: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarkers of neurodegenerative diseases are relatively sensitive and specific in highly curated research cohorts, but proper validation for clinical use is mostly missing. OBJECTIVE: We studied these biomarkers in a novel memory clinic cohort with a variety of different neurodegenerative diseases. METHODS: This study consisted of 191 patients with subjective or objective cognitive impairment who underwent neurological, CSF biomarker (Aß42, p-tau, and tau) and T1-weighted MRI examinations at Kuopio University Hospital. We assessed CSF and imaging biomarkers, including structural MRI focused on volumetric and cortical thickness analyses, across groups stratified based on different clinical diagnoses, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), frontotemporal dementia, dementia with Lewy bodies, Parkinson's disease, vascular dementia, and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and subjects with no evidence of neurodegenerative disease underlying the cognitive symptoms. Imaging biomarkers were also studied by profiling subjects according to the novel amyloid, tau, and, neurodegeneration (AT(N)) classification. RESULTS: Numerous imaging variables differed by clinical diagnosis, including hippocampal, amygdalar and inferior lateral ventricular volumes and entorhinal, lingual, inferior parietal and isthmus cingulate cortical thicknesses, at a false discovery rate (FDR)-corrected threshold for significance (analysis of covariance; p < 0.005). In volumetric comparisons by AT(N) profile, hippocampal volume significantly differed (p < 0.001) between patients with normal AD biomarkers and patients with amyloid pathology. CONCLUSION: Our analysis suggests that CSF and MRI biomarkers function well also in clinical practice across multiple clinical diagnostic groups in addition to AD, MCI, and cognitively normal groups.


Brain/diagnostic imaging , Neurodegenerative Diseases/cerebrospinal fluid , Neurodegenerative Diseases/diagnosis , Aged , Biomarkers/cerebrospinal fluid , Brain/pathology , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Neurodegenerative Diseases/pathology , Organ Size , Retrospective Studies
...